A recently viral post on X (formerly Twitter) has ignited a heated online debate after Dr. Ally Louks, an academic claiming to teach at the University of Cambridge, shared that she had completed her PhD. While earning a doctorate is typically a moment of personal celebration, Dr Louks’ choice of thesis topic, titled “Olfactory Ethics: The Politics of Smell in Modern and Contemporary Prose,” has made her the center of internet attention.
A unique academic pursuit
Announcing the achievement, Dr. Louks posted: “Thrilled to say I passed my viva with no corrections and am officially PhDone,” alongside a photo of herself holding the dissertation.
She also shared the abstract to provide insight into her research, which she described as exploring how literature reflects the language of smell and its role in shaping social structures.
“This thesis studies how literature registers the importance of olfactory discourse—the language of smell and the olfactory imagination it creates—in structuring our social world,” read the abstract. It further explained the work’s aim to examine “olfactory oppression,” identifying how perceptions of smell intersect with power dynamics related to gender, class, race, and other social constructs.
One chapter, for instance, analyzed how smell signifies class distinctions, particularly in the context of homelessness, drawing on George Orwell’s writings and other media.
Backlash
The post quickly went viral, garnering 3.2 million views and over 2,000 comments, with social media users sharply divided. Critics questioned the practicality and value of such research.
“Sis literally wrote a PhD thesis on why it’s racist and/or classist to not like it when people stink,” one user mocked. Another wrote, “How did this dissertation get accepted? It provides nothing of value.” Some skeptics also aimed public funding for higher education, with one comment reading, “Tax money well spent. Good luck with the debt.”
Amid the criticism, others rallied to defend Dr. Louks. “People are being so mean to this woman for no reason. Some people just want to study books; that’s not a crime,” one user remarked. Another added, “That looks like a super interesting piece of research. The cruelty in the replies says more about the critics than about her work.”
The polarized reaction highlights a broader debate about the perceived relevance and impact of academic research. Critics often question the real-world applications of niche fields of study, while supporters argue for the intrinsic value of intellectual exploration.
Dr. Louks has not publicly responded to the online uproar, but her dissertation continues to spark conversation, reflecting the enduring intersection of academia, culture, and social media scrutiny. Whether viewed as groundbreaking or frivolous, “Olfactory Ethics” has certainly captured the internet’s attention.
