The unveiling of the suspected remnants of non-human remains during Mexico’s first congressional hearing on UFOs prompted jaws to drop and a lot of talk on social media. Jaime Maussan, a journalist who has theorized extensively about aliens, exhibited the mummies. The fact that Mexico’s Congress actually heard Mr. Maussan’s statement drew attention from all over the world. The American space agency convened a conference on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), sometimes known as UFOs, calling the remains “unusual things” but urging transparency.
The mummies were discovered in Peru in 2017
The two mummies were discovered in Peru in 2017. They have a small stature and a powdery color. They all had three-fingered hands and shrunken heads. According to carbon testing conducted by specialists at Mexico’s National Autonomous University, the specimens were around 1,000 years old. Researchers, on the other hand, have distanced themselves from the journalist’s allegations, with an independent expert calling the show “shameful.” In July, three former military officers described to a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee their disturbing encounters with high-tech, unexplained flying objects. One of them even claimed that the US government is secretly holding on to extraterrestrial wreckage.
Retired Navy commander David Fravor described an encounter with a “white Tic Tac-shaped object” after launching his fighter jet from the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier. “There were no rotors, no rotor wash, or any visible flight control surfaces like wings,” he testified. The Pentagon, however, denied all such claims.
NASA personnel were questioned about the purported “non-human remains” during the UFO hearing in Mexico’s Congress
On Thursday, the American Space Agency held a press conference regarding an independent panel investigating UFOs. NASA personnel were questioned about the purported “non-human remains” during a UFO hearing in Mexico’s Congress. Former Princeton University astrophysics department head and UAP report chair David Spergel claimed he didn’t know the nature of the samples but encouraged transparency. “I’ve only seen something like this on Twitter.” When you have unusual data, you want to make it public,” Mr Spergel explained. “Make samples available to the world scientific community and we’ll see what’s there,” he later told the BBC.