Several factual inaccuracies in an American magazine’s story that was produced by AI have drawn criticism: Report

Several factual inaccuracies in American magazine's story that was produced by AI have drawn criticism: Report

A sports magazine has drawn criticism for significant inaccuracies in its AI-generated pieces (AI). The Men’s Journal, a publication of The Arena Group, released its first piece produced by artificial intelligence (AI) titled “What All Men Should Know About Low Testosterone” under the byline “Men’s Fitness Editors.” Futurism reported on the piece on Thursday, February 9; it included many health claims, dietary recommendations, and lifestyle suggestions. The paper also recommended testosterone replacement therapy as a specific medical remedy.

The story was written with the certain authority of a genuine expert, like much content produced by AI

The story was written with the certain authority of a genuine expert, like much content produced by AI. Additionally, it included academic citations and a disclaimer stating that the editorial team evaluated and fact-checked it. However, upon closer examination, the mistakes were found. The University of Washington Medical Center’s chief of medicine, Bradley Anawalt, told Futurism that the article frequently misrepresented medical knowledge and had factual errors that gave readers a seriously distorted perspective of health issues. Anawalt claimed the narrative contained numerous inconsistencies and fabrications.

“It lacks many of the nuances that are crucial to understanding normal male health”

“It lacks many of the nuances that are crucial to understanding normal male health,” he added. Anawalt also pointed out 18 specific errors in the story, some about basic medical topics while others claimed sweeping links between diet, testosterone levels, and psychological symptoms. starsoffline “There is just enough proximity to the scientific evidence and literature to have the ring of truth,” the chief of medicine at the UW Medical Center told Futurism while adding, “But there are many false and misleading notes.”

The Arena Group’s magazines will begin to print AI-generated content starting this week, and CEO Ross Levinsohn promised that the standard of the pieces won’t suffer as a result. But this assertion is now up for debate. The Men’s Journal reportedly faced challenging times, according to the Futurism study. The magazine’s owner at the time had fired all of the editorial staff in 2020. Only five employees, including two part-timers, are listed on the magazine’s staff page. The Arena Group only acquired the publication in December of last year.

The testosterone article underwent a number of adjustments after Futurism contacted the group

The testosterone article underwent a number of adjustments after Futurism contacted the group and the magazine about the problems, and Bradley Anawalt pointed out and fixed a number of inaccuracies. A note that said, “The earlier version of this story portrayed testosterone replacement therapy as using synthetic hormones,’ and stated poor nutrition as one of the most prevalent causes of low T, which are erroneous,” also appeared at the bottom of the article.

However, there were other revisions that weren’t included in the notice above, like a claim that Anawalt had made concerning the health dangers of milk. “We are studying various AI products that can be additive to our editing teams’ workflow, as with many media organizations,” a group spokeswoman said in a statement emailed to Futurism after the piece was revised.

These early experiments are a work in progress

“An initial pilot collating previously published archival content demonstrated the potential of AI coupled with editors and writers. These early experiments are a work in progress. Based on these learnings and ongoing monitoring, we will continue to refine our use of these tools as part of our workflow, which has been and will always be anchored in editorial oversight,” the statement added.

When asked if The Arena Group was in charge of disseminating health information that needed to be almost entirely rewritten, if it was confident in the rest of the bot’s stories’ accuracy, and if it planned to continue disseminating AI content, the statement replied, “Confident, yes, but no immediate plans.”

Exit mobile version