The global cryptocurrency ecosystem is dealing with this billion-dollar question. Who invented Bitcoin and wrote the 2008 white paper that launched the blockchain-based cryptocurrency? For years, people attributed the invention of this revolutionary money to a legendary entity known as ‘Satoshi Nakamoto.’ Satoshi Nakamoto is believed to have published the white paper in 2008, exchanged some emails with the currency’s early supporters, and then vanished in 2011. Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity is shrouded in mystery, and some even dispute his existence.
The controversy over who owns Bitcoin heated up in 2016
However, the controversy over who owns Bitcoin heated up in 2016 when Australian programmer Craig Wright claimed to be the progenitor of the highly valued cryptocurrency. Furthermore, he accused the crypto developer community of “misusing his creation” by making it into an expensively traded commodity when the initial plan was to utilize it as digital cash for tiny, everyday transactions. Craig Wright’s claims are massive, and if proven in court, bitcoin would be trapped behind a wall of patents and copyright applications, from which Wright’s company might earn a lot of money in fees.
While the 53-year-old Australian technologist has waged a lot of legal battles over the last eight years, the most recent one involves the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), which strongly opposes Wright’s claims and describes them as a “brazen lie.” It petitioned the London High Court for a “negative declaration” that Wright is not Nakamoto. COPA is no ordinary organization, with former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and bitcoin trading behemoth Coinbase as its primary backers. The trial, which began on Monday (Feb 5), is anticipated to last a month and is being heard in England and Wales’ high courts’ business and property divisions.
“Dr. Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto is a brazen lie”
COPA’s barrister, Jonathan Hough, said on the first day of the trial, “Our case is that Dr Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto is a brazen lie, an elaborate false narrative supported by forgery on an industrial scale.” Hough also claimed that the documents that Wright presented to prove himself as Satoshi were fake and contradictory.
COPA said in a court filing that Wright’s copy of the 2008 “white paper,” which serves as the foundation text for Bitcoin, is written in a different format from the original document. COPA contends that, while Wright’s copy was produced in LaTeX, the original was written in OpenOffice. COPA went on to say that the file presented by Craig Wright links to a pdf “which only superficially resembles the bitcoin white paper but is substantially different”. COPA also claimed, based on metadata information from the file, that it was produced on November 19, 2023, as a blank document. COPA even stated that one of the documents released by Wright appeared to be written by ChatGPT.
Craig Wright argues that some of the apparent inconsistencies in his documentary evidence are caused by back-dated edits, technical glitches, logistical or legal snafus, or unauthorised tampering. Wright also questioned the credibility of the independent experts who pointed out flaws in his documents. “I have done over 20 masters degrees now,” Wright is said to have boasted in the courtroom. However, the court ruled that it was open to relying on opinions given by an independent expert.
Wright reportedly offered to settle the matter, which COPA rejected
Last month, Wright reportedly offered to settle the matter, which COPA rejected. The offer included a payment to an Australian church and a requirement for his detractors in the developer community to stop “any media campaign(s) against me”. The offer also asked unknown businesses to stop claiming to represent the original Bitcoin “as envisioned by me as Satoshi Nakamoto”. “I believe the settlement terms are broadly uncontroversial, beneficial to the industry as a whole, and intended to draw a fresh start in the history of bitcoin to guarantee its success in whatever form it takes,” Wright was quoted as saying in his settlement proposal.
However, COPA said the offer carried several loopholes that Wright could still use in his favour to issue threats against the developer community. Despite claiming to be the original creator of bitcoin, Wright has yet to provide the private keys – a secure code consisting of a hexadecimal string of numbers and letters – that would grant access to the 1.1 million original bitcoins “mined” by Nakamoto, which are worth approximately $46 billion at the current price.
Wright maintains that he destroyed the computer hard drive that would have allowed him access to the keys. As the court case drags on, the crypto community is interpreting the proceedings back and forth. The case has sparked so much attention that the court has allowed individuals to check in and watch it online. Meanwhile, Wright’s spokeswoman claimed the trial was “really a war.” “Think of it as a modern-day tech battle, akin to that between Blu-ray and HD DVD or, for even older readers, Betamax versus VHS,” he added.